REvolutionH-tl: A Fast and Robust Tool for Decoding Evolutionary Gene Histories
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract REvolutionH-tl is a fast, scalable, and integrated software platform for inferring orthology relationships, gene trees, species trees, and reconciled evolutionary scenarios directly from sequence data. Built upon the formal framework of best match graphs (BMGs), REvolutionH-tl predicts orthogroups and orthologous gene pairs with high accuracy, requiring neither precomputed trees nor multiple external tools. The software reconstructs event-labeled gene and species trees, seamlessly integrating reconciliation to produce fast, accurate, and biologically insightful evolutionary scenarios. Through extensive benchmarking on synthetic datasets with known ground truth, REvolutionH-tl outperforms or matches the accuracy of established tools such as OrthoFinder, Proteinortho, RAxML, GeneRax, and RANGER-DTL, while achieving significantly lower runtimes. A key innovation of REvolutionH-tl is its built-in support for detailed, publication-ready visualizations, which allow users to explore genome evolution dynamics, orthogroup composition, and reconciliation results with clarity and ease. These visual features position REvolutionH-tl as the first platform of its kind to combine analytical precision with intuitive interpretability. The software is open-source, cross-platform, and freely available at https://pypi.org/project/revolutionhtl/ , providing a robust solution for large-scale evolutionary analyses in comparative genomics. Author summary Comparative genomics relies on understanding how genes evolve across species. This involves identifying groups of related genes, reconstructing their evolutionary trees, and aligning them with the evolutionary history of species. These steps are typically performed using multiple tools, often requiring manual integration and technical expertise. We present REvolutionH-tl , an open-source software that automates the entire evolutionary reconstruction process—starting from protein sequences and producing gene trees, species trees, orthology assignments, and reconciled evolutionary scenarios. Unlike existing tools, REvolutionH-tl also includes built-in, high-quality visualizations that help users interpret complex evolutionary events such as gene duplications and losses. We evaluated REvolutionH-tl on simulated genomes with known evolutionary histories and found that it matches or exceeds the performance of widely used tools, while being significantly faster. Its visual output makes evolutionary analysis more accessible and interpretable, offering a valuable resource for researchers studying genome evolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".