Modelling Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall for a Small Capital Market: Do Fractionally Integrated Models and Regime Shifts Matter?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we examine the relevance of the coexistence of structural change and long memory to model and forecast the volatility of Tunisian stock returns and to deliver a more accurate measure of risk along the lines of VaR and expected shortfall. To this end, we propose three time-series models that incorporate long-term dependence on the level and volatility of returns. In addition, we introduce structural change points using the iterated cumulative sums of squares (ICSS) and the modified ICSS algorithms, synonymous with stock market turbulence, into the conditional variance equations of the models studied. We choose a conditional innovation density function other than the normal distribution, that is, a Student distribution, to account for excess kurtosis. The empirical results show that the inclusion of structural breakpoints in the conditional variance equation and Dual LM provides better short- and long-term predictability. Within such a framework, the ICSS-ARFIMA-HYGARCH model with Student’s t distribution was able to account for the long-term dependence in the level and volatility of TUNINDEX index returns, excess kurtosis, and structural changes, delivering an accurate estimator of VaR and expected shortfall.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".