Cardiovascular disease in chronic kidney disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) exhibit an increased risk for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) with its manifestations coronary artery disease, stroke, heart failure, arrhythmias, and sudden cardiac death. The presence of both, CVD and CKD has a major impact on the prognosis of patients. This association likely reflects the involvement of several pathophysiological mechanisms, including shared risk factors (e.g. diabetes and hypertension), as well as other factors such as inflammation, anaemia, volume overload, and the presence of uraemic toxins. Identifying and characterizing CKD is crucial for appropriate CVD risk prediction. Mitigating CVD risk in patients with CKD mandates a multidisciplinary approach involving cardiologists, nephrologists, and other health care professionals. The present State-of-the-Art Review addresses the current understanding on the pathophysiological link between CVD and CKD, clinical implications and challenges in the treatment of these patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".