MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409282018 · doi:10.18192/olbij.v14i1.6895

Polyglottes, langues et négociations identitaires

2025· article· fr· W4409282018 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Natalia Dankova

Bibliographic record

VenueOLBI Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLinguistic and Sociocultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article présente des résultats d’une étude qualitative basée sur des entrevues semi-dirigées avec des polyglottes multiculturels de différents pays. Les participants utilisent régulièrement au moins quatre langues vivantes et ont des liens étroits avec plusieurs pays (famille, amis, travail, études, etc.). L’étude aborde des questions liées aux négociations identitaires, aux distorsions dans la perception de l’identité des polyglottes par l’entourage, au degré d’importance accordée à la reconnaissance de l’identité telle que définie par des polyglottes eux-mêmes, aux éléments retenus pour s’autodéfinir ou définir l’Autre, aux rapports avec les langues utilisées et au rôle que jouent ces langues dans la construction et dans la définition de l’identité.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.333 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOLBI JournalSame topicLinguistic and Sociocultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207