Development and Validation of a Modular Sensor-Based System for Gait Analysis and Control in Lower-Limb Exoskeletons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With rapid advancements in lower-limb exoskeleton hardware, two key challenges persist: the accurate assessment of user biomechanics and the reliable control of device behavior in real-world settings. This study presents a modular, sensor-based system designed to enhance both biomechanical evaluation and control of lower-limb exoskeletons, leveraging advanced sensor technologies and fuzzy logic. The system addresses the limitations of traditional lab-bound, high-cost methods by integrating inertial measurement units, force-sensitive resistors, and load cells into instrumented crutches and 3D-printed insoles. These components work independently or in unison to capture critical biomechanical metrics, including the anteroposterior center of pressure and crutch ground reaction forces. Data are processed in real time by a central unit using fuzzy logic algorithms to estimate gait phases and support exoskeleton control. Validation experiments with three participants, benchmarked against motion capture and force plate systems, demonstrate the system's ability to reliably detect gait phases and accurately measure biomechanical parameters. By offering an open-source, cost-effective design, this work contributes to the advancement of wearable robotics and promotes broader innovation and accessibility in exoskeleton research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".