Extracting Pulmonary Embolism Diagnoses From Radiology Impressions Using GPT-4o: Large Language Model Evaluation Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a critical condition requiring rapid diagnosis to reduce mortality. Extracting PE diagnoses from radiology reports manually is time-consuming, highlighting the need for automated solutions. Advances in natural language processing, especially transformer models like GPT-4o, offer promising tools to improve diagnostic accuracy and workflow efficiency in clinical settings. Objective This study aimed to develop an automatic extraction system using GPT-4o to extract PE diagnoses from radiology report impressions, enhancing clinical decision-making and workflow efficiency. Methods In total, 2 approaches were developed and evaluated: a fine-tuned Clinical Longformer as a baseline model and a GPT-4o-based extractor. Clinical Longformer, an encoder-only model, was chosen for its robustness in text classification tasks, particularly on smaller scales. GPT-4o, a decoder-only instruction-following LLM, was selected for its advanced language understanding capabilities. The study aimed to evaluate GPT-4o’s ability to perform text classification compared to the baseline Clinical Longformer. The Clinical Longformer was trained on a dataset of 1000 radiology report impressions and validated on a separate set of 200 samples, while the GPT-4o extractor was validated using the same 200-sample set. Postdeployment performance was further assessed on an additional 200 operational records to evaluate model efficacy in a real-world setting. Results GPT-4o outperformed the Clinical Longformer in 2 of the metrics, achieving a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% CI 1.0-1.0; Wilcoxon test, P<.001) and an F1-score of 0.975 (95% CI 0.9495-0.9947; Wilcoxon test, P<.001) across the validation dataset. Postdeployment evaluations also showed strong performance of the deployed GPT-4o model with a sensitivity of 1.0 (95% CI 1.0-1.0), a specificity of 0.94 (95% CI 0.8913-0.9804), and an F1-score of 0.97 (95% CI 0.9479-0.9908). This high level of accuracy supports a reduction in manual review, streamlining clinical workflows and improving diagnostic precision. Conclusions The GPT-4o model provides an effective solution for the automatic extraction of PE diagnoses from radiology reports, offering a reliable tool that aids timely and accurate clinical decision-making. This approach has the potential to significantly improve patient outcomes by expediting diagnosis and treatment pathways for critical conditions like PE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".