The Relationship between Alexithymia and Socially Learned Helplessness
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study explores the relationship between alexithymia and socially learned helplessness. The research employed a questionnaire method, using a self-designed general demographic questionnaire, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), and a Learned Helplessness Questionnaire (LHQ) to survey adults in Gansu Province. The aggregate of 431 questionnaires were captured from the internet. After organizing the data, SPSS 26.0 was used for data analysis. The results showed a significant correlation between alexithymia and socially learned helplessness (ps < 0.001), with alexithymia positively predicting socially learned helplessness (β = 0.745, t = 27.872, p < 0.001). Enhanced concentrations of alexithymia were concomitant with higher degree of socially learned helplessness. These results indicate that individuals ought to prioritize improving their emotional expression abilities, as this can help reduce the tendency toward socially learned helplessness and promote mental and physical health.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it