MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409290249 · doi:10.1016/j.tvjl.2025.106349

Socio-geographic and demographic analysis of the official national registry data of dogs’ population in Portugal in 2023. Data from SIAC

2025· article· en· W4409290249 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Katia Pinello, Helena Geraz, Helena Sofia Salgueiro, Ed Wilson Rodrigues Vieira, Denisa Mendonça, Mílton Severo, Ana Isabel Ribeiro, João Niza‐Ribeiro

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Veterinary Journal · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicHuman-Animal Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, Universidade do PortoUniversidade do Porto
KeywordsPopulationGeographyEnvironmental healthMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

National data on dog populations has been historically scarce, hindering effective policy and welfare efforts. The SIAC (Information System for Companion Animals) registry now provides a robust dataset for analyzing dog demographics in Portugal. This study examines SIAC data (2004–2023), analyzing breed, sex, reproductive status, age, and geographic distribution. Chi-square tests with post-hoc residual analysis identified significant demographic and breed variations across districts, while clustering based on standardized residuals grouped districts by distinct profiles. Geographic and socioeconomic distributions were assessed using the European Deprivation Index and urbanicity classification, with spatial visualizations generated in R and QGIS. The dataset includes 2,581,870 dogs, with a predominance of younger dogs (ages 2–3 years), a slight male majority (51.6 %), and 54.4 % neutered. Mixed-breed dogs were most common (39.6 %), followed by Portuguese Podengo (10.9 %) and Labrador Retriever (6.1 %). Age distributions varied geographically, with younger dogs in rural areas and older dogs in urban settings. Rural regions had higher dog-to-household ratios, while urban and economically deprived areas had higher absolute dog numbers but lower ratios. The findings establish baseline data for canine studies and highlight social patterns in the dog population. They underscore the role of rural areas in preserving native Portuguese breeds and the need for targeted public health and veterinary initiatives. By integrating demographic, geographic, and socioeconomic factors, this study provides key insights to inform public health and animal welfare policies, advocating for tailored strategies to meet the diverse needs of urban and rural canine populations. • Analysis of 2.58 M dogs in Portugal reveals demographic, breed, and geographic patterns. • Cluster analysis identifies similar age and breed patterns among neighboring municipalities. • Rural areas preserve native breeds, while urban centers favor smaller international breeds. • The proportion of dogs gradually increases with higher levels of socioeconomic deprivation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.068
Threshold uncertainty score0.221

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.394
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Veterinary JournalSame topicHuman-Animal Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207