Ventilation approaches and radon control in Canadian houses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Balanced mechanical ventilation with heat (sensible heat only) or energy (sensible and latent heat) recovery has the potential to dilute indoor radon and may be an appropriate first step at reducing moderate indoor radon concentration in a house with mechanical exhaust only. A field study of the effectiveness of heat/energy recovery ventilation systems at reducing moderate indoor radon concentration was conducted in 13 occupied houses and three test houses in Canada. Controlled experiments were also conducted at the test houses to evaluate indoor radon concentration under different depressurization and ventilation scenarios. Methods: In the field study of heat recovery ventilation systems (HRVs) in occupied homes, the indoor radon concentration was measured for different HRV settings within a season to estimate the effectiveness of radon reduction. In the controlled depressurization experiments in the test houses, the change in pressure of the basement relative to the subslab and of the basement, main floor and second floor relative to outdoors was evaluated for a range of mechanical exhaust ventilation scenarios. Results: . The median (25th-75th percentiles) effectiveness of radon reduction was 39% (29-50) for continuous HRV operation at high fan speed in the 12 field study houses where it was connected directly to the forced air furnace heating systems. In the test houses, the sustained operation of mechanical exhaust ventilation devices, however, increased the depressurization and the indoor radon concentration, and the indoor radon concentrations observed at the depressurization of -5 Pa were higher than those observed at -10 and -20 Pa. Conclusion: Balanced mechanical ventilation with heat recovery was shown to be an effective radon control strategy in a field study of occupied houses with a moderate initial indoor radon concentration. Improving the energy efficiency of the existing housing stock is a priority in many countries, and including balanced mechanical ventilation systems may be an effective radon control option when conducting energy retrofits in existing houses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".