MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409312394 · doi:10.1371/journal.pgph.0004395

Point-of-care determination of the frequency of Rhesus(D)-negative blood types and the uptake of anti(D) immunoglobulin among Rh(D)-negative women in Dadu district, Sindh, Pakistan

2025· article· en· W4409312394 on OpenAlexafffund
Lisa G. Pell, Shabina Ariff, Gul Nawaz Khan, Hana Dampf, Shah Muhammad Jokhio, Alvin Zipursky, Jillian M. Baker, Sidrah Nausheen, Sajid Soofi, Shaun K. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenuePLOS Global Public Health · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesCentre for Global Health ResearchSickKids FoundationUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
FundersGrand Challenges Canada
KeywordsMedicineObstetricsRh blood group systemAntibodyMiscarriagePregnancyGestationHaemolytic diseaseGynecologyImmunologyFetus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rhesus (Rh) disease remains a serious problem in low- and middle-income countries. Rh disease prevention requires early identification and prophylactic treatment of Rh(D)-negative women. We evaluated the feasibility of point-of-care identification of Rh(D)-negative women and timely administration of two doses of anti(D) immunoglobulin by lady health visitors in Dadu district, Sindh, Pakistan. Pregnant women were enrolled at two hospitals and followed until 29 days postpartum. Rh(D)-antigen status was determined using the EldonCard2521 test and all Rh(D)-negative point-of-care test results were attempted to be verified using the conventional test tube agglutination method. Rh(D)-negative women were offered two injections of anti(D) immunoglobulin, one at 28 weeks' gestation and one within 72 hours of delivery. Knowledge pertaining to Rh disease was assessed among participants at study entry and exit, and in a sample of 30 health care providers. All participants (n=1619) had their blood tested with the EldonCard2521, and 279 (17%) women were found to be Rh(D)-negative; however, the conventional test tube method identified one discordant Rh(D)-antigen result. Among 278 Rh(D)-negative women, 254 (91%) and 268 (96%) received their first and second dose of anti(D) immunoglobulin, respectively. The rates of miscarriage (22.1 per 1,000 pregnancies vs. 4.5 per 1,000 pregnancies), stillbirth (33.8 per 1,000 pregnancies vs. 6.7 per 1,000 pregnancies), and neonatal death (35.0 vs. 16.6 per 1,000 live births) were higher among Rh(D)-negative vs. Rh(D)-positive participants. At study enrolment, there was little knowledge pertaining to Rh disease and its consequences among participants and knowledge also varied greatly among health care providers. The high frequency of maternal Rh(D)-negative blood types, high rates of stillbirth, miscarriage, and neonatal death among Rh(D)-negative women and their newborns, and limited and varied knowledge of Rh disease among pregnant women and health care providers, bolsters the need for a wide-scale Rh disease prevention program in Pakistan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.105
Threshold uncertainty score0.574

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLOS Global Public HealthSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207