MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409317286 · doi:10.1126/science.adq9592

Direct neutrino-mass measurement based on 259 days of KATRIN data

2025· article· en· W4409317286 on OpenAlexaff
M. Aker, Dominic Batzler, A. Beglarian, J. Behrens, J. Beisenkötter, M. Biassoni, B. Bieringer, Y. Biondi, F. Block, S. Bobien, Matthias Böttcher, B. Bornschein, L. Bornschein, T. S. Caldwell, Marco Carminati, Auttakit Chatrabhuti, S. Chilingaryan, K. Debowski, M. Descher, D. Díaz Barrero, P. J. Doe, O. Dragoun, Guido Drexlin, F. Edzards, K. Eitel, Enrico Ellinger, R. Engel, S. Enomoto, A. Felden, Caroline Fengler, C. Fiorini, J. A. Formaggio, Christian Forstner, Florian M. Fränkle, K. Gauda, A. S. Gavin, W. Gil, F. Glück, S. Grohmann, Robin Größle, R. Gumbsheimer, Nathanael Gutknecht, V. Hannen, L. Haßelmann, N. Haußmann, K. Helbing, S. Heyns, Stephanie Hickford, R. Hiller, D. Hillesheimer, D. Hinz, Thomas Höhn, Anton Huber, A. Jansen, C. Karl, J. Kellerer, Khanchai Khosonthongkee, M. Kleifges, Manuel Klein, J. Kohpeiß, Christoph Köhler, L. Köllenberger, A. Kopmann, Neven Kovač, A. Kovalı́k, Holger Krause, Luisa La Cascio, Thierry Lasserre, J. Lauer, Thanh-Long Le, O. Lebeda, B. Lehnert, Gen Li, A. Lokhov, M. Machatschek, Martin Mark, A. Marsteller, E. L. Martín, C. Melzer, S. Mertens, Shailaja Mohanty, J. Mostafa, Klaus Müller, A. Nava, Holger Neumann, S. Niemes, A. Onillón, D. S. Parno, M. Pavan, Udomsilp Pinsook, A. W. P. Poon, J. M. L. Poyato, S. Pozzi, Florian Priester, Jan Ráliš, S. Ramachandran, R. G. H. Robertson, C. Rodenbeck, M. Röllig, Carsten Röttele, M. Ryšavý, Rudolf Sack, Alejandro Sáenz, R. Salomon, Peter Schäfer, Magnus Schlösser, K. Schlösser, L. Schlüter, S. Schneidewind, U. Schnurr, M. Schrank, J. Schürmann, Ann-Kathrin Schütz, Alessandro Schwemmer, Adrian Schwenck, M. Šefčík, Daniel Siegmann, F. Simon, F. Spanier, D. Spreng, Warintorn Sreethawong, Markus Steidl, J. Štorek, X. Stribl, Michael Sturm, N. Suwonjandee, Nicholas Tan Jerome, Helmut H. Telle, L. A. Thorne, T. Thuemmler, Simon Tirolf, N. A. Titov, I. Tkachev, K. Urban, K. Valerius, Drahoslav Vénos, C. Weinheimer, S. Welte, J. Wendel, Christoph Wiesinger, J. F. Wilkerson, J. Wolf, Sascha Wüstling, J. Wydra, W. L. Xu, G. Zeller

Bibliographic record

VenueScience · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNeutrino Physics Research
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Particle Physics
FundersLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryKarlsruhe School of Elementary Particle and Astroparticle Physics: Science and Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of TechnologyIstituto Nazionale di Fisica NucleareEuropean CommissionBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungNational Energy Research Scientific Computing CenterDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsKATRINNeutrinoPhysicsAlgorithmAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNuclear physicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

That neutrinos carry a nonvanishing rest mass is evidence of physics beyond the Standard Model of elementary particles. Their absolute mass holds relevance in fields from particle physics to cosmology. We report on the search for the effective electron antineutrino mass with the KATRIN experiment. KATRIN performs precision spectroscopy of the tritium β-decay close to the kinematic endpoint. On the basis of the first five measurement campaigns, we derived a best-fit value of m ν 2 = − 0.14 − 0.15 + 0.13 eV 2 , resulting in an upper limit of m ν < 0.45 eV at 90% confidence level. Stemming from 36 million electrons collected in 259 measurement days, a substantial reduction of the background level, and improved systematic uncertainties, this result tightens KATRIN’s previous bound by a factor of almost two.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations97
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScienceSame topicNeutrino Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207