MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409318313 · doi:10.1186/s12864-025-11545-6

Impacts of prenatal nutrition on metabolic pathways in beef cattle: an integrative approach using metabolomics and metagenomics

2025· article· en· W4409318313 on OpenAlexaff
Guilherme Henrique Gebim Polizel, Wellison J. S. Diniz, Germán Darío Ramírez-Zamudio, Ángela Cánovas, Evandro Fernando Ferreira Dias, Arícia Christofaro Fernandes, Bárbara Carolina Teixeira Prati, Édison Furlan, Gabriela do Vale Pombo, Miguel Henrique de Almeida Santana

Bibliographic record

VenueBMC Genomics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersFaculdade de Zootecnia e Engenharia de Alimentos, Universidade de São PauloConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsMetabolomeBiologyMetabolomicsMicrobiomeMetagenomicsMetabolic pathwayMetaboliteFecesKEGGComputational biologyTranscriptomeBioinformaticsGeneticsGeneBiochemistryMicrobiologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This study assessed the long-term metabolic effects of prenatal nutrition in Nelore bulls through an integrated analysis of metabolome and microbiome data to elucidate the interconnected host-microbe metabolic pathways. To this end, a total of 126 cows were assigned to three supplementation strategies during pregnancy: NP (control)- only mineral supplementation; PP- protein-energy supplementation during the last trimester; and FP- protein-energy supplementation throughout pregnancy. At the end of the finishing phase, blood, fecal, and ruminal fluid samples were collected from 63 male offspring. The plasma underwent targeted metabolomics analysis, and fecal and ruminal fluid samples were used to perform 16 S rRNA gene sequencing. Metabolite and ASV (amplicon sequence variant) co-abundance networks were constructed for each treatment using the weighted gene correlation network analysis (WGCNA) framework. Significant modules (p ≤ 0.1) were selected for over-representation analyses to assess the metabolic pathways underlying the metabolome (MetaboAnalyst 6.0) and the microbiome (MicrobiomeProfiler). To explore the metabolome-metagenome interplay, correlation analyses between host metabolome and microbiome were performed. Additionally, a holistic integration of metabolic pathways was performed (MicrobiomeAnalyst 2.0). RESULTS: A total of one and two metabolite modules associated with the NP and FP were identified, respectively. Regarding fecal microbiome, three, one, and two modules for the NP, PP, and FP were identified, respectively. The rumen microbiome demonstrated two modules correlated with each of the groups under study. Metabolite and microbiome enrichment analyses revealed the main metabolic pathways associated with lipid and protein metabolism, and regulatory mechanisms. The correlation analyses performed between the host metabolome and fecal ASVs revealed 13 and 12 significant correlations for NP and FP, respectively. Regarding the rumen, 16 and 17 significant correlations were found for NP and FP, respectively. The NP holistic analysis was mainly associated with amino acid and methane metabolism. Glycerophospholipid and polyunsaturated fatty acid metabolism were over-represented in the FP group. CONCLUSIONS: Prenatal nutrition significantly affected the plasma metabolome, fecal microbiome, and ruminal fluid microbiome of Nelore bulls, providing insights into key pathways in protein, lipid, and methane metabolism. These findings offer novel discoveries about the molecular mechanisms underlying the effects of prenatal nutrition. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMC GenomicsSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207