MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409319857 · doi:10.2196/64853

Assessing Social Interaction and Loneliness and Their Association With Frailty Among Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline or Mild Cognitive Impairment: Ecological Momentary Assessment Approach

2025· article· en· W4409319857 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bada Kang, Dahye Hong, Seolah Yoon, Jennifer Ivy Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR mhealth and uhealth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFrailty in Older Adults
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLonelinessAssociation (psychology)CognitionPsychologyPreprintGerontologyCognitive declineDementiaEcologyClinical psychologyMedicinePsychiatryBiologyDiseasePsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Frail older adults are at greater risk of adverse health-related outcomes such as falls, disability, and mortality. Mild behavioral impairment (MBI), which is characterized by neurobehavioral symptoms in individuals without dementia, is a crucial factor in identifying at-risk groups and implementing early interventions for frail older adults. However, the specific role of social functioning, which encompasses social interaction and loneliness levels, in relation to frailty within this group remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the association between frailty status, social interaction frequency, and loneliness levels among older adults with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) while adjusting for MBI symptoms in 2 contexts: the presence and severity of MBI symptoms. METHODS: Older adults with SCD or MCI were recruited from an outpatient clinic specializing in the early diagnosis and care management of dementia at a community health center, as well as from a community service center in Seoul, South Korea. Using an ecological momentary assessment approach, participants reported their daily social interaction frequency and loneliness level via a mobile app, 4 times daily for 2 weeks. Frailty status, the outcome variable, was assessed using the Korean version of the frailty phenotype questionnaire. Additionally, MBI symptoms were assessed using the 34-item MBI-Checklist covering 5 domains. Multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association between frailty status (robust, prefrail, and frail), and the independent variables, adjusting for the presence or severity of MBI symptoms. RESULTS: Among the 101 participants analyzed, 29.7% (n=30) of participants were classified as prefrail, and 12.8% (n=13) of participants were classified as frail. Higher average daily social interaction scores were consistently associated with lower odds of a frail status compared to a robust status. This was evident in the models adjusted for both the global presence (relative risk ratio [RRR] 0.18, P=.02) and global severity (RRR 0.20, P=.02) of MBI symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent social interaction was inversely associated with frail status in older adults with SCD or MCI, even after adjusting for the presence and severity of MBI symptoms. These findings highlight the potential of social functioning as a modifiable factor for addressing frailty among older adults at risk of cognitive and functional decline. Future prospective studies using real-time measurements are needed to refine these findings and further investigate additional risk factors and functional outcomes in this group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.392
Teacher spread0.351 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR mhealth and uhealth→Same topicFrailty in Older Adults→French-language works237,207→