Unconscious Mind-Inspired Algorithm: A Novel Approach to Machine Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work aims to present a novel algorithm referred by unconscious mind-inspired algorithm (UMIA), that targets to incorporate principles derived from the unconscious mind and put it into computational processes.This work will seek to replicate fundamental aspects of the unconscious mind, such as efficient information processing, instinctive decision-making, and flexible learning and by sketching upon theories derived from psychoanalysis and cognitive psychology.The design algorithm encompasses a series of steps aimed at the development of a conceptual framework the utilization of data processing models influenced by subliminal perception and the implementation of intuitive decisionmaking algorithms.The phase of testing and validation involves the utilization of simulations and practical applications, with a specific emphasis on factors such as accuracy, efficiency, adaptability and user feedback.UMIA holds the potential to bring about a paradigm shift in algorithmic methodologies by integrating cognitive processes that resemble human intelligence.This integration has the potential to yield enhanced performance across a range of applications exceeding the capabilities of current machine learning algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".