MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409323492 · doi:10.2196/67767

Web-Based Explainable Machine Learning-Based Drug Surveillance for Predicting Sunitinib- and Sorafenib-Associated Thyroid Dysfunction: Model Development and Validation Study

2025· article· en· W4409323492 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Fan-Ying Chan, Y. Y. Ku, Wen‐Nung Lie, Hsiang‐Yin Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Formative Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSunitinibMachine learningArtificial intelligenceReceiver operating characteristicGradient boostingDecision treeBoosting (machine learning)Computer scienceRandom forestLogistic regressionMedicineF1 scoreData miningInternal medicineRenal cell carcinoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Unlike one-snap data collection methods that only identify high-risk patients, machine learning models using time-series data can predict adverse events and aid in the timely management of cancer. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models for sunitinib- and sorafenib-associated thyroid dysfunction using a time-series data collection approach. Methods: Time series data of patients first prescribed sunitinib or sorafenib were collected from a deidentified clinical research database. Logistic regression, random forest, adaptive Boosting, Light Gradient-Boosting Machine, and Gradient Boosting Decision Tree were used to develop the models. Prediction performances were compared using the accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and area under the precision-recall curve. The optimal threshold for the best-performing model was selected based on the maximum F1-score. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis was conducted to assess feature importance and contributions at both the cohort and patient levels. Results: The training cohort included 609 patients, while the temporal validation cohort had 198 patients. The Gradient Boosting Decision Tree model without resampling outperformed other models, with area under the precision-recall curve of 0.600, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.876, and F1-score of 0.583 after adjusting the threshold. The SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis identified higher cholesterol levels, longer summed days of medication use, and clear cell adenocarcinoma histology as the most important features. The final model was further integrated into a web-based application. Conclusions: This model can serve as an explainable adverse drug reaction surveillance system for predicting sunitinib- and sorafenib-associated thyroid dysfunction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Formative ResearchSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207