MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409325425 · doi:10.1029/2024jb029955

Investigation of Submarine Permafrost Conditions in the Canadian Beaufort Sea Using Diving Wave Tomography

2025· article· en· W4409325425 on OpenAlexaffabout
Henrik Grob, Dirk Klaeschen, Michael Riedel, Sebastian Krastel, Mathieu J. Duchesne, Jefferson Bustamante Restrepo, Gabriel Fabien‐Ouellet, Young Keun Jin, Jong Kuk Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicClimate change and permafrost
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalGeological Survey of Canada
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsBeaufort seaPermafrostSubmarineOceanographyGeologyBeaufort scaleEnvironmental scienceArctic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Submarine permafrost in the Canadian Beaufort Sea is relict terrestrial permafrost, which is continuously degrading since the change of thermal conditions induced by a marine transgression that followed the last glaciation. Permafrost degradation has a crucial socio‐ecological significance because its thawing can result in geohazards like landslides or an increase in greenhouse gas emissions. These consequences are mostly regulated by the state of ice in permafrost. In this study, we use marine multichannel seismic data to apply a diving wave tomographic inversion on the outer 50 km of the Canadian Beaufort Shelf. Due to the close relationship between seismic velocity and ice content, we are able to infer detailed information about the present submarine permafrost condition. We find a clear variability of permafrost occurrences between the inner and outer Canadian Beaufort Shelf. At the inner shelf, discontinuous ice‐bonding permafrost occurs extensively close to the seafloor but is interrupted by taliks. Within the outer ∼27 km of the shelf, ice‐bonding permafrost is absent in the upper sediments and its top has plunged to >200 m below sea level. These findings add new details to the current state of the degrading permafrost. In addition, we observe seismic anisotropy in the frozen permafrost sediments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid EarthSame topicClimate change and permafrostFrench-language works237,207