Efficient and scalable construction of clinical variable networks for complex diseases with RAMEN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the interplay among clinical variables-such as demographics, symptoms, and laboratory results-and their relationships with disease outcomes is critical for advancing diagnostics and understanding mechanisms in complex diseases. Existing methods fail to capture indirect or directional relationships, while existing Bayesian network learning methods are computationally expensive and only infer general associations without focusing on disease outcomes. Here we introduce random walk- and genetic algorithm-based network inference (RAMEN), a method for Bayesian network inference that uses absorbing random walks to prioritize outcome-relevant variables and a genetic algorithm for efficient network refinement. Applied to COVID-19 (Biobanque québécoise de la COVID-19), intensive care unit (ICU) septicemia (MIMIC-III), and COPD (CanCOLD) datasets, RAMEN reconstructs networks linking clinical markers to disease outcomes, such as elevated lactate levels in ICU patients. RAMEN demonstrates advantages in computational efficiency and scalability compared to existing methods. By modeling outcome-specific relationships, RAMEN provides a robust tool for uncovering critical disease mechanisms, advancing diagnostics, and enabling personalized treatment strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".