MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409332254 · doi:10.1002/vro2.70008

Fluoroscopic guidance for bulla identification during ventral bulla osteotomy in eight French bulldogs

2025· article· en· W4409332254 on OpenAlexaff
Hui Yu Lu, Jeffery J. Biskup, L Mehrkens, Debbie Reynolds

Bibliographic record

VenueVeterinary Record Open · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicVeterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Canadian institutionsNorth York General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBulla (seal)MedicineFluoroscopyOsteotomyRadiographySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: To describe the technique and outcome of fluoroscopy to guide bulla identification in French bulldogs during ventral bulla osteotomy. Materials and methods: Medical records of eight French bulldogs with otitis media that underwent a fluoroscopic-guided ventral bulla osteotomy between January 2020 and June 2023 were reviewed. Demographics, preoperative diagnostic findings, advanced imaging findings, surgical times, histopathology and culture results, as well as postoperative outcomes, were recorded. Results: Following routine dissection of the bulla, fluoroscopic imaging was used to confirm the placement of a Steinmann pin before bulla penetration. The median surgical time was 152 minutes (range: 80-210 minutes). All dogs survived to discharge. Six out of eight dogs retained an ipsilateral head tilt postoperatively. Two dogs exhibited residual vestibular ataxia at 14 days postoperatively, which improved and resolved 7 months and 2 years postoperatively respectively. One dog developed recurring otitis media, and a total ear canal ablation and lateral bulla osteotomy were recommended. Clinical significance: Intraoperative fluoroscopy can be used successfully to guide the identification of the bulla in ventral bulla osteotomies in brachycephalic breeds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.312 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVeterinary Record OpenSame topicVeterinary Orthopedics and NeurologyFrench-language works237,207