Interspecific Responses to Fire in a Mixed Forest Reveal Differences in Seasonal Growth
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite recurring episodes of fire exacerbated by climate change, post-fire dynamics in trees remain to be fully understood. In a mixed forest in northern Mexico that experiences frequent fires, we aimed to determine how tree growth responds to surface fire by examining earlywood (EW) and latewood (LW) responsiveness, as well as their connection with canopy activity, using UAV-acquired NDVI data. We compared EW and LW growth from mini cores of burned and unburned trees (n = 100) across four species, correlating this with NDVI data from 33 UAV monthly flights at the individual tree level from 2021 to 2023. Our results identified Quercus durifolia Seemen as the species that presented the highest growth following exposure to surface fire. Arbutus arizonica (A. Gray) Sarg. was the species most affected by fire in terms of EW production immediately after burning but showed benefits in subsequent summers. Juniperus deppeana Steud. demonstrated adaptive plasticity by responding more quickly to fire, with notable growth in EW. Pinus engelmannii Carrière responded in 2023, and its NDVI was associated to the least extent with seasonal growth. Thus, there is an evident seasonal response in trees subjected to low-intensity fire, which can act to shape the stand habitat. However, there is a divergence in response between broadleaf and evergreen species that could be attributed to fire-adaptive traits and hydraulic strategies. Although combining the tree-ring data with the NDVI served to improve our understanding of the effects of fire, further research is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".