MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409336660 · doi:10.5334/ijic.9481

Developing a decision-tool to help organizations design care patterns for people with complex care facilitating integrated care: the ICARE4OLD project

2025· article· en· W4409336660 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Integrated Care · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAssembly Line Balancing Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegrated careNursingHealth careProcess managementKnowledge managementMedicineBusinessComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Older adults receiving home care (HC) services or living in long-term care facilities (LTCF) often experience multimorbidity. Identifying subgroups of older people sharing the same types of chronic diseases and having similar levels of impairment can help organizations target interventions effectively. Decision-support tools can foster tailored care and integrated care for these persons, as they are based on the comprehensive assessment of all needs and capabilities a person has. The iCARE4OLD project aims at developing decision-support tools with machine learning techniques. These tools will assist physicians and caregivers to better plan healthcare trajectories for older people, using data collected with the interRAI instruments. Methods: Data from a large sample of older people receiving HC services or living in LTC homes in Canada, Italy, Finland, and New Zealand were used to run a Latent Class Analysis (LCA). This technique classified individuals according to their underlying disease patterns starting from a list of 19 chronic conditions. Results: The combined sample from all countries (N=102,000) showed a mean age of 80 years old and 65% were female. The LCA yielded a 5-class solution as the best model for all countries, for both HC and LTC, including five disease patterns. One of the models showed the following groups (1) Alzheimer/dementia; (2) psychiatric diseases; (3) cardio-pulmonary diseases ; (4) stroke/hemiplegia ; (5) other dementias. The groups of cardio-pulmonary disease pattern and the stroke/hemiplegia disease patterns showed the highest complexity, especially in Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), with 68.5% and 77.8% living with impairment. Conclusion: Our results showed that, by using a standardized assessment tool such as the interRAI, it is possible to identify homogeneous morbidity patterns in older patients receiving care in the community or long-term residential care. Prognostic machine learning algorithms are being developed and validated to better predict various health outcomes and to evaluate the modifying impact of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions. These algorithms will be the basis of an electronic decision support tool, which will be used by health professionals working in home care and nursing homes. This tool will show which care paths to be followed to achieve better health outcomes for older persons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.845
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it