MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409337656 · doi:10.5194/acp-25-4107-2025

Marine organic aerosol at Mace Head: effects from phytoplankton and source region variability

2025· article· en· W4409337656 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Emmanuel Chevassus, Kirsten N. Fossum, Darius Čeburnis, Lei Lü, Chunshui Lin, Wei Xu, Colin O’Dowd, Jurgita Ovadnevaitė

Bibliographic record

VenueAtmospheric chemistry and physics · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitute of Urban Environment, Chinese Academy of SciencesScience Foundation Ireland
KeywordsMaceEnvironmental scienceAerosolPhytoplanktonOceanographyHead (geology)Atmospheric sciencesGeologyMeteorologyGeographyBiologyEcologyNutrientGeomorphologyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Organic aerosol (OA) is recognized as a significant component of particulate matter (PM), yet their specific composition and sources, especially over remote areas, remain elusive due to the overall scarcity of high-resolution online data. In this study, positive matrix factorization was performed on organic aerosol mass spectra obtained from high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS) measurements to resolve sources contributing to coastal PM. The focus was on a summertime period marked by enhanced biological productivity with prevailing pristine maritime conditions. Four OA factors were deconvolved by the source apportionment model. The analysis revealed primary marine organic aerosol (PMOA) as the predominant submicron OA at Mace Head during summertime, accounting for 42 % of the total resolved mass. This was trailed by more oxidized oxygenated organic aerosol (MO-OOA) at 32 %, methanesulfonic acid organic aerosol (MSA-OA) at 17 %, and locally emitted peat-derived organic aerosol (peat-OA) at 9 % of the total OA mass. Elemental ratios (O:C–H:C) were derived for each of these factors: PMOA (0.66–1.16), MO-OOA (0.78–1.39), MSA-OA (0.66–1.39), and peat-OA (0.43–1.34). The specific O:C–H:C range for MO-OOA hints at aliphatic and lignin-like compounds contributing to more oxidized organic aerosol formation. The total mass concentrations of primary organic aerosol and secondary organic aerosol were overall equal and almost exclusively present in the marine boundary layer, in agreement with previous findings. This study reveals that OA not only reflects atmospheric chemistry and meteorology – as evidenced by the significant ageing of summertime polar air masses over the North Atlantic, driven by ozonolysis under Greenland anticyclonic conditions – but also serves as an indicator of marine ecosystems. This is evident from MSA-OA being notably associated with stress enzyme markers and PMOA showing the typical makeup of largely abacterial phytoplankton extracellular metabolic processes. This study also reveals distinct source regions within the North Atlantic for OA factors. MSA-OA is primarily associated with the Iceland Basin, with rapid production following coccolithophore blooms (lag of 1–2 d), while diatoms contribute to a slower formation process (lag of 9 d), reflecting distinct oceanic biological processes. In contrast, PMOA is sourced from more variable ecoregions, including the southern Celtic Sea, western European Basin, and Newfoundland Basin, with additional contributions from chlorophytes and cyanobacteria at more southerly latitudes. Overall, these findings emphasize the need for longer-term investigations to further map the influence of phytoplankton taxa variability on aerosol composition and the broader impacts on aerosol–climate interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAtmospheric chemistry and physics→Same topicAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols→French-language works237,207→