MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409338629 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-k4v52

Optimizing mixtures of metal–organic frameworks for robust and bespoke passive atmospheric water harvesting

2025· preprint· en· W4409338629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2025
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar-Powered Water Purification Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBespokeMetal-organic frameworkEnvironmental scienceProcess engineeringBusinessChemistryEngineeringOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Atmospheric water harvesting (AWH) is a method to obtain clean water in remote or underdeveloped regions including, but not limited to, those with an arid or desert climate. For passive, adsorbent-based AWH, an adsorbent bed is employed to capture water from cold, humid air at nighttime, while during the daytime the bed is then exposed to ambient sunlight to heat it and desorb the water for collection. Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) are tunable, nanoporous materials with suitable water adsorption properties for comprising this adsorbent bed. The water delivery by the MOF adsorbent bed in a passive AWH device depends on (1) the nighttime, capture conditions (temperature and humidity) and daytime, release conditions and (2) the structure(s) of the MOF(s) comprising the bed, which dictate MOF-water interactions. We hypothesize that (1) an adsorbent bed comprised of a mixture or portfolio of MOFs, each specialized for different capture and release conditions, may deliver water with robustness to day-to-day weather fluctuations, and (2) the optimal composition of the adsorbent bed depends on the geographic region and time frame. Herein, we develop a method to optimally design the total mass and composition of a MOF mixture comprising an adsorbent bed for bespoke and robust passive AWH---i.e., tailored to a declared geographic region and time frame and satisfying minimum daily water delivery requirements. We combine historical weather data in the declared region, water adsorption data in the candidate MOFs, and thermodynamic adsorption models to frame a linear program expressing our optimal design principle: adjust the mass of each candidate MOF comprising the mixture to yield the minimal-mass adsorbent bed that satisfies the daily water delivery constraints. Based on our three case studies in the Chihuahuan Desert in June and the Sonoran Desert in June and in August, we find: (1) a mixed-MOF adsorbent bed can be, but is not always, lighter than its optimized single-MOF counterpart; and (2) the optimal composition and mass of the adsorbent bed differs by both geographic region and time frame. Finally, we visualize the linear program for a reduced problem with a two-dimensional design space to gain intuition, conduct a sensitivity analysis, and compare to a AWH field study. Our work is a starting point for optimizing the composition of adsorbent beds for robust, passive AWH and tailoring them for specific AWH missions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it