MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409340755 · doi:10.56367/oag-046-11966

Programmable iontronic neural networks

2025· article· en· W4409340755 on OpenAlexaff
Guo‐Xing Miao

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access Government · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Programmable iontronic neural networks Guo-Xing Miao, Professor at the University of Waterloo, guides us through programmable iontronic neural networks. Inspired by both the biological neurons and the thriving lithium-ion batteries, we construct iontronic memristors for harvesting neuromorphic functionalities. The advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) has been accelerating and has dramatically impacted our daily lives, such as content generation, supply chain optimization, financial management and forecasting, targeted database search, automated vehicles/robots, embedded systems with unsupervised decision-making, and many more scenarios. It is unsurprising that all major players are heavily investing in AI in the current race towards true artificial general intelligence (AGI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.984
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.348
Teacher spread0.324 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Access GovernmentSame topicNeural Networks and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207