MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409342582 · doi:10.1002/adma.202570108

Ultrahigh Specific Strength by Bayesian Optimization of Carbon Nanolattices (Adv. Mater. 14/2025)

2025· article· en· W4409342582 on OpenAlex
Peter Serles, Jinwook Yeo, Michel J.R. Haché, Pedro Guerra Demingos, Jonathan Kong, Pascal Kiefer, Somayajulu Dhulipala, Boran Kumral, Katherine Min Jia, Shuo Yang, Tianjie Feng, Charles Q. Jia, Pulickel M. Ajayan, Carlos M. Portela, Martin Wegener, Jane Y. Howe, Chandra Veer Singh, Yu Zou, Seunghwa Ryu, Tobin Filleter

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTribology and Wear Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceBayesian optimizationCarbon fibersNanotechnologyComposite materialArtificial intelligenceComposite numberComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bayesian Optimization of Carbon Nanolattices Machine Learning designs new nanolattice geometries with the strength of carbon steel, but the density of Styrofoam, offering record strength-to-weight of lightweight materials. By implementing multi-objective Bayesian optimization in combination with two-photon polymerization and pyrolysis, these ultrahigh specific strength carbon nanolattices more than double the performance of benchmark materials. More details can be found in article number 2410651 by Peter Serles, Tobin Filleter, Seunghwa Ryu, and co-workers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.078
Threshold uncertainty score0.614

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it