Corticothalamic modeling of sleep neurophysiology with applications to mobile electroencephalography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent developments in mathematical modeling of electroencephalography (EEG) enable the tracking of otherwise-inaccessible neurophysiological parameters throughout sleep. Likewise, advancements in wearable electronics have enabled easy and affordable collection of sleep EEG at home. The convergence of these two advances, namely neurophysiological modeling for mobile sleep EEG, can boost preclinical and clinical assessments of sleep. However, this subject area has received limited attention in existing literature. To address this, we used an established model of the corticothalamic system to analyze EEG power spectra from five datasets, spanning from research-grade systems to at-home mobile EEG. In the present work, we compare the convergent and divergent features of the data and the estimated physiological model parameters. While data quality and characteristics differ considerably, key patterns consistent with previous theoretical and empirical work are observed. During the transition from lighter to deeper NREM, (1) exponent of the aperiodic (1/f) spectral component is increased, (2) bottom-up thalamocortical drive is reduced, (3) corticocortical connection strengths are increased. This effect is observed in healthy subjects but is interestingly absent when taking SSRI antidepressants, suggesting possible effects of ascending neuromodulation on corticothalamic oscillations. We further show a month-long increase in REM% in one mobile EEG subject, associated with boosted high-frequency activity in spectra and higher thalamothalamic gains in the model, pointing to possible changes of thalamic inhibition in REM parasomnias. Our results provide a proof-of-principle for the utility and feasibility of this physiological modeling-based approach to analyzing mobile EEG data, providing a mechanistic measure of brain physiology during sleep.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".