Canadian Hospital Pharmacy Residency Graduates / Diplômés de Programmes Canadiens de Résidence en Pharmacie Hôpitalière
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Editors of the Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy would like to publicly acknowledge and congratulate the individuals listed below,* who graduated from accredited Canadian hospital pharmacy residency programs in 2024.This remarkable milestone not only signifies their dedication and hard work but also paves the way for numerous opportunities in their professional journey ahead.Graduates understand the profound impact of pharmacy research on our field.Much of this research has been spearheaded by previous graduates from Canadian hospital pharmacy residency programs.Their contributions have not only earned national and international recognition for Canadian hospital pharmacy programs but have also propelled the profession forward, solidifying its crucial role in Canadian health care both now and in the future.We encourage graduates to continue this tradition of excellence by getting involved with our journal.Consider submitting your own research and participating in the review process, as ways of contributing to the ongoing advancement of our profession.To cite / Comment citer cet article : Canadian hospital pharmacy residency graduates / Diplômés de programmes canadiens de résidence en pharmacie hôpitalière.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".