[BRAF V600E-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with suspected malignant transformation of the bile duct adenoma:a case report].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 69-year-old woman was diagnosed with extrahepatic portal vein occlusion and liver cirrhosis. Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a ring-enhanced liver tumor. A liver tumor biopsy detected small bile duct proliferation without atypia and a map-like pattern on immunostaining for glutamine synthetase, resulting in a focal nodular hyperplasia diagnosis. CT after 4 years revealed the increased liver tumor. The patient was suspected of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma based on MRI findings. A liver tumor biopsy was re-conducted, and the patient was diagnosed with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (small duct type), which was positive for BRAF V600E on immunostaining. We re-investigated the initial liver tumor biopsy tissue and diagnosed the BRAF V600E-positive bile duct adenoma, indicating a malignant transformation of the bile duct adenoma to an intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".