MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409347241 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i15.33770

Few-Shot Audio-Visual Class-Incremental Learning with Temporal Prompting and Regularization

2025· article· en· W4409347241 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yawen Cui, Li Liu, Zitong Yu, Guanjie Huang, Xiaopeng Hong

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstituto de Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaInstitute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction
KeywordsAudio visualShot (pellet)Class (philosophy)Computer scienceRegularization (linguistics)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionComputer graphics (images)Speech recognitionMultimediaChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Audio-Visual Learning (AVL) aims at the audio-visual perception with both audio and vision modalities. AVL also suffers from data insufficiency in many applications as with other unimodal tasks. Concurrently, AVL often needs to continuously learn over time rather than all knowledge simultaneously. Considering the above two perspectives, our work mainly focuses on benchmarking the unexplored Few-Shot Audio-Visual Class-Incremental Learning (FS-AVCIL), i.e., continually perceiving novel categories described by a limited number of labeled examples with audio and visual modalities. Firstly, we provide the detailed task configuration together with a thorough analysis of the challenges in FS-AVCIL: (1) how to efficiently learn and fuse multimodal information with limited labeled examples; and (2) how to alleviate catastrophic forgetting cross-modal semantic correlations with limited data. Then, we propose an efficient framework based on Vision Transformer to solve FS-AVCIL. This framework contains two parts: temporal-residual prompting for audio-visual synergy adapter and temporal prompt regularization. Specifically, temporal-residual prompting is incorporated into the audio-visual adapter to efficiently finetune the pre-trained foundation model with limited data and capture audio-visual correlation by learning temporal-relevant prompts. Besides, we regularize temporal-relevant prompts to memorize previous knowledge by fully using the temporal knowledge from various perspectives. This framework is validated in audio-visual classification tasks under the FS-AVCIL scenario, and extensive experiments demonstrate its superior performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.596
Threshold uncertainty score0.626

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial IntelligenceSame topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207