MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409348390 · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2025.105016

Enzyme- and nanozyme-based food allergen detections: from natural biocatalysts to rational engineering approaches

2025· article· en· W4409348390 on OpenAlexaff
Shuang Wu, Jinlong Zhao, Youfa Wang, Vijaya Raghavan, Pengfei Dong, Xinxue Zhang, Jie Han, Rui Wang, Ya‐Jie Tang, Geoffrey I. N. Waterhouse, Jin Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueTrends in Food Science & Technology · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaNational University's Basic Research Foundation of China
KeywordsFood allergensBiochemical engineeringNatural (archaeology)AllergenEnzymeChemistryEnvironmental scienceBiologyBiochemistryEngineeringAllergyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The global prevalence of food allergies has experienced a substantial surge, significantly impacting populations worldwide. Consequently, the development of precise and sensitive detection techniques targeting these major allergens become increasingly ED 01 (eliciting dose of 1 %) to ensure accurate identification. Compared to conventional allergen analysis techniques, enzyme-based biosensors have shown high sensitivity, simplicity, and cost-effectiveness in detecting trace food allergens. However, the inherent instability of natural enzymes underscores its applications. More advanced catalysts to enhance sensing performance are necessary. In this review, we systematically summarize biosensors that integrate the historical development of enzyme-based biosensing devices, traditional enzyme-based biosensors, and advancements in enzyme-mimetic nanomaterials for food allergen detection, categorizing them by signal transduction methods, including colorimetric, electrochemical, fluorescence, chemiluminescent, electrochemiluminescence, and photoelectrochemical techniques. Moreover, sensor construction approaches and signaling mechanisms have been elaborated, highlighting how these methodologies contribute to the overall effectiveness and specificity of food allergen detection. Nanozymes have huge potential as potential alternatives to traditional biocatalysts in food allergen detection due to their exceptional storage stability, facile engineering, and reusability. With the increasing need of highly sensitive devices, novel signaling transduction methods have been designed with novel nanozymes that provide the required performances. Future research on biosensors using engineered nanozymes is anticipated to advance accurate allergen identification and improving food safety and consumer protection. • Reviewed enzyme-based biosensing methods for food allergen monitoring. • Major enzyme-mediated signal methodologies (electrochemical and optical) are introduced. • Advantages and limitations of nanozyme-enabled food allergen biosensors presented. • Future directions to optimize the performance of nanozymatic biosensors are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.981

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrends in Food Science & TechnologySame topicAdvanced Nanomaterials in CatalysisFrench-language works237,207