MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409353814 · doi:10.1016/j.xops.2025.100793

Systematic Review of Proteomics in Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Pathway Analysis of Significant Protein Changes

2025· review· en· W4409353814 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOphthalmology Science · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRetinal Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNova Scotia Health AuthorityNational Eye InstituteAristotle University of ThessalonikiONL TherapeuticsLowy Medical Research InstituteHope FoundationMacula SocietySunovionMassachusetts Eye and EarValeant Pharmaceuticals InternationalHeed Ophthalmic Foundation
KeywordsMacular degenerationProteomicsPathway analysisMedicineComputational biologyBioinformaticsBiologyOphthalmologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Topic: Proteomics in age-related macular degeneration (AMD) research. Clinical Relevance: AMD is the leading cause of blindness in industrialized countries, with a poorly understood pathogenesis. Proteomics can identify significantly altered proteins in AMD patients, aiding in understanding the disease's pathophysiology and potentially improving diagnosis or treatment strategies. Methods: A systematic review of proteomic studies in AMD was conducted. Proteins significantly altered in dry and wet AMD and those tested as biomarkers were presented according to sample type (aqueous humor, plasma, urine, vitreous, retinal pigment epithelium/choroid, and tear film) and type of assay (mass spectrometry or aptamers) used in the individual studies. Proteins that exhibited at least a 2× fold change (FC) were further analyzed through functional enrichment analysis and protein-protein interaction networks (STRING database). Results: Twenty-two studies (case-control and cohorts) with a total of 6932 participants were included. The included studies showed significant heterogeneity, and most of them lacked sufficient power. Results suggested that various proteins and pathways are implicated in AMD, and there were differences when comparing results from the individual studies and unbiased results. Although many proteins differed significantly between AMD and control groups, most exhibited less than a 2-FC. Functional analysis of proteins with ≥|2|-FCs (identified by unbiased proteomics in multiple biofluids) highlighted lipid metabolism and protease regulation pathways as central to both dry and wet AMD. Complement and coagulation cascades, chaperones, and glycolysis pathways were significant in wet AMD, whereas matrix remodeling pathways were enriched mostly in dry AMD. Conclusion: Combining proteomics from various studies could reveal new protein-protein interaction networks and associated functional pathways that may suggest novel potential therapeutic targets for AMD. However, there is a scarcity of data available for early AMD from ocular biofluids, and it should be the aim of future proteomics studies. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.582

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.358
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it