MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409359519 · doi:10.1139/er-2024-0078

Dissolved and particulate organic carbon transport among forest, river, and wetland ecosystems: a review of processes, controlling factors, challenges, and prospects

2025· review· en· W4409359519 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Zelin Liu, Li Peng, Xiaolu Zhou, Zhengmiao Deng, Ziying Zou, Jiayi Tang, Cicheng Zhang, Tong Li, Changhui Peng

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Reviews · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPeatlands and Wetlands Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Hainan Province
KeywordsEnvironmental scienceWetlandParticulatesEcosystemDissolved organic carbonParticulate organic carbonEcologyTotal organic carbonEnvironmental protectionHydrology (agriculture)NutrientBiologyPhytoplankton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Streams and rivers receive organic carbon (OC), including dissolved (DOC) and particulate (POC) forms, from forests and wetlands, playing a vital role in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems. Despite growing interest in OC dynamics, its cross-ecosystem migration remains poorly understood and reviewed. This review synthesizes key DOC and POC transport processes, controlling factors, and tracing methods across forests, wetlands, and rivers, aiming to deepen the understanding of carbon dynamics across different ecosystems. It also discusses current research gaps, challenges, and prospects. In forests and wetlands, DOC is mainly derived from vegetative carbon sinks, rainfall wash-off, and organic matter decomposition, while POC is derived from vegetative surface wash-off, rock weathering, and plant residues. Through soil respiration, overland flow, interflow, and leaching losses, with significant contributions from groundwater as well, some of the OC is released to the atmosphere and some enters the river system. DOC and POC sources are classified as exogenous and endogenous within river systems. Exogenous sources mainly enter runoff, including apoplastic litter, humus, root secretions, and anthropogenic releases from agriculture, industry, and households. Notably, most of the POC produced by erosion on slopes does not reach rivers. Endogenous sources originate from overall biological activity within the river. The main export pathways for DOC and POC in aquatic systems are CO 2 release, deposition, and downstream transport. These processes are significantly influenced by climate change and human activity, with rainfall as the key driver of POC erosion and migration. Advanced technologies such as high-frequency measurements, process modeling, elemental analysis, stable isotopes, and molecular marker identification allow for accurate tracking and monitoring of OC dynamics. Remote sensing techniques, on the other hand, provide large-scale, continuous carbon concentration data in an efficient and cost-effective manner, facilitating the monitoring of carbon dynamics in different regions and time scales. We have also identified hotspots and gaps in the current research, which will help us to promote an in-depth understanding of the OC transport and conversion mechanisms in multiple ecosystems under background of climate change and anthropogenic disturbances, and could provide important insights and to move forward for future DOC and POC transport studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental ReviewsSame topicPeatlands and Wetlands EcologyFrench-language works237,207