MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409359819 · doi:10.1139/cjes-2024-0166

A multi-proxy modern training set for reconstructing Holocene relative sea level using salt-marsh sediment (Prince Edward Island, Canada)

2025· article· en· W4409359819 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Andrew C. Kemp, Robin Edwards, Fermin Alvarez-Agoues, Emmanuel Bustamante, Zoë A. Roseby, Andrea D. Hawkes, Philip Woodworth

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDivision of Ocean Sciences
KeywordsHoloceneGeologySalt marshProxy (statistics)MarshSea levelOceanographySedimentPhysical geographyArchaeologyGeomorphologyWetlandGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reconstructing Holocene relative sea-level change from salt-marsh sediment requires a modern training set that captures the observable relationship between proxies and local tidal elevation. We collected 143 surface sediment samples from four salt marshes in Prince Edward Island (PEI, Canada) to develop a modern training set of foraminifera and bulk-sediment δ13C and δ15N values. Two sites have semi-diurnal tidal regimes, one has a mixed regime, and one has a diurnal regime. Combining and standardizing datasets from different tidal regimes fails to adequately characterize the relationship between elevation and inundation. Our principal results are from the semi-diurnal sites. Salt-marsh foraminifera in PEI form low-diversity, elevation-dependent zones that are replicated within sites, among sites, and between two studies conducted 44 years apart. Botanical zonation of PEI salt marshes often includes a platform with C4 plants and an adjacent, higher transitional community of C3 plants. Bulk-sediment δ13C values mirror the dominant vegetation. Isotopic results from PEI are combined with datasets from Delaware to Massachusetts to explore how elevation thresholds and δ13C cut-off values can recognize environments of deposition. We propose that δ13C values more negative than –20.0‰ indicate formation above an elevation threshold placed slightly below mean higher high water, while δ13C values less negative than –17.0‰ characterize environments lower than an elevation threshold slightly above mean higher high water. Bulk-sediment δ15N values display a correlation with tidal elevation and botanical zone, but may be subject to anthropogenic and post-depositional modification limiting their utility as a sea-level proxy. The dataset of modern foraminifera is suitable for reconstructing relative sea level and could be combined with informative δ13C values in a multi-proxy approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.371
Threshold uncertainty score0.747

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.093
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Earth Sciences→Same topicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research→French-language works237,207→