MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409359851 · doi:10.1139/cjps-2024-0107

Alfalfa cultivars respond differently to seed germination inhibition by Kentucky bluegrass

2025· article· en· W4409359851 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Achref Meddeb Slama, Marie‐Noëlle Thivierge, Dalel Abdi, Y. A. Papadopoulos, C. Lafrenière, Kathleen Glover, Julie Lajeunesse, J. L. Duynisveld, I. B. Mandell, Renée-Frédérique Duchesneau, Emilie Cheguem, Chantal Lachance, Vincent Poirier

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Plant Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicTurfgrass Adaptation and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphGrain Research CentreQuebec Rehabilitation Research NetworkUniversité du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaBeef Cattle Research CouncilFondation de l’Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue
KeywordsGerminationCultivarBiologyAgronomyHorticulture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allelopathic effects may be a contributing factor in the mixed success of legume re-establishment in Kentucky bluegrass ( Poa pratensis L.)-dominated pastures. Under controlled conditions, we evaluated whether aqueous shoot or root extracts from Kentucky bluegrass would affect seed germination for three alfalfa ( Medicago sativa L.) cultivars after a 7-day incubation period. Both shoot and root extracts had an inhibitory effect on alfalfa seed germination for all cultivars. AAC Trueman was the least affected and AC Caribou the most affected by aqueous Kentucky bluegrass root extracts, suggesting that the capacity for rejuvenating old pastures may vary among alfalfa cultivars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.692
Threshold uncertainty score0.933

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Plant ScienceSame topicTurfgrass Adaptation and ManagementFrench-language works237,207