MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409359913 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2023-0378

Modelling of thermo-mechanical behaviour of steel beam–column shear tab connections exposed to localized fires

2025· article· en· W4409359913 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Aikaterini S. Genikomsou, Chloe Jeanneret

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire effects on concrete materials
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institute of Steel Construction
KeywordsStructural engineeringShear (geology)Beam (structure)Column (typography)Materials scienceEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringComposite materialConnection (principal bundle)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Localized nonuniform fires occur impacting the structural response of steel structures, with the nonuniformity of localized fires to induce both longitudinal and transverse temperature gradients. These nonuniform effects are important in both, evaluating the performance of structural details, and in the design methodology of more severe and complex scenarios such as travelling fires. Exploring the localized effects allows for more informed decisions about appropriate design strategies and reduces risk of failure of the structure. Therefore, finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to produce a thermal response of a steel beam–column connection. Utilizing a decoupled thermo-mechanical analysis, the mechanical response of the assembly was found and both temperatures and midspan deflections were validated against three fire exposures of an experimental steel beam–column connection. The FEA results are in agreement with the experimental data, suggesting the capability of the FEA model to simulate the maximum influence of a localized fire event.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.194
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicFire effects on concrete materialsFrench-language works237,207