MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409360112 · doi:10.1139/cjc-2024-0155

Theoretical studies on the long nitrogen chain structure and the constructing mechanism of a catenated N<sub>11</sub> cation

2025· article· en· W4409360112 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yue-zhen Yang, Lei Xu, Xiaofeng Wang, Zhaowei Xu, Tong Li, Weijing Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergetic Materials and Combustion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMechanism (biology)NitrogenComputational chemistryStereochemistryCrystallographyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The long nitrogen chain compound, as a potential energetic material, exhibits remarkable explosive properties. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct an in-depth investigation into its structural characteristics and construction mechanism. Herein, a catenated N 11 cation was theoretically studied. It has a relatively low sensitivity and a possible decomposition mechanism triggered by the weak N−N bonds, which agrees well with the experimental results. We proposed a synthesis mechanism involving the N−N bond formation and the two-step proton shift with energy barriers of 6.63, 57.53, and 43.81 kcal mol −1 , respectively. The proton shift effectively strengthens the newly formed N−N bond while maintaining structural balance. Furthermore, a comparative reaction was studied to highlight the value of utilizing heterocyclic nitrogen structures for developing long nitrogen chain energetic compounds. These results give theoretical support for developing new high energy density materials and all-nitrogen energetic materials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.304
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicEnergetic Materials and CombustionFrench-language works237,207