MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409360116 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2024-0319

Forest fuel structure and loading along a gradient of gray-phase mountain pine beetle severity in Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada

2025· article· en· W4409360116 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Tristan Skretting, L. Chasmer, Christopher J. Watson, Patrick M. A. James, Ivan Townshend, Daniel D. B. Perrakis

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFire effects on ecosystems
Canadian institutionsCanadian Forest ServiceNatural Resources CanadaUniversity of TorontoParks CanadaUniversity of Lethbridge
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta InnovatesParks CanadafRI Research
KeywordsNational parkMountain pine beetleForestryNational forestEcologyEnvironmental scienceGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wildland fire fuels within the gray-phase of mountain pine beetle ( Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins) outbreak (4–10 years post mortality) are treated as homogenous despite potential variability. To assess if proportion of mortality due to mountain pine beetle in gray-phase stands significantly affects fuel structure, composition, and loading, detailed fuel measurements were collected across a range of severity in Jasper National Park, Alberta, Canada, by coincidence 1–3 years before a major wildfire. These were categorized based on outbreak severity thresholds of Light (<35%), Moderate (36%–65%), and Severe (>65%) beetle-induced pine mortality defined as the proportion of killed trees within a stand. The canopy fuels of both mature and small tree cohorts were significantly reduced with increasing outbreak severity. Severely affected stands showed a 49% reduction in mature tree canopy bulk density from original loading but increased herbaceous vegetation. Moderately affected stands had higher coarse woody debris loading (mean = 3.21 kg m– 2; SE = 0.49 kg m–2). These severity ratings can be used to quantify canopy fuel loss and signal potential shifts to other surface fuel types, barring fire. This is one of the first studies to showcase variability within gray-phase outbreak fuels, despite their prevalence in western Canada, and discuss the potential influences on fire behaviour.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.104

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2025
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest Research→Same topicFire effects on ecosystems→French-language works237,207→