MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4409361083 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i28.35198

Model AI Assignments 2025

2025· article· en· W4409361083 on OpenAlexaff
Todd W. Neller, Bhalerao, Rasika, Eun Kyung Ko, Thamotharan, Vishodana, Lisa Zhang, Sonya Allin, Haghifam, Mahdi, Pawliuk, Michael, Rutwa Engineer, Shkurti, Florian, Cao Ma, Daniella DiPaola, Cynthia Breazeal, Alonzi, Loreto, Brian Wright, Alicia Rivera, Fasiang, Kristin, Duri Long, Chockkalingam, Shruthi, Giulia Toti, Evan Shieh, Okoroafor, Princewill, Thema Monroe‐White, Haiderbhai, Mustafa, Quinlan, Carolyn, Bharadwaj, Ashwin R., Anthony Lin Zhang, Venkatesaramani, Rajagopal, Sarah Wharton, John Masla, Lydia Guterman, Gustafson-Quiett, Mary Cate, Christina Bosch, Macatantan, Calvin, Eric Klopfer, Hal Abelson, Wein, Shira, Gachoka, Mercy Wairimu, Chang, Li-Hsin, Mirzaei, Maryam, Ajallooeian, Mohammad Mahdi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEthics and Social Impacts of AI
Canadian institutionsNorQuest CollegeYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Model AI Assignments session seeks to gather and disseminate the best assignment designs of the Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education community. Recognizing that assignments form the core of student learning experience, we here present abstracts of thirteen AI assignments from the 2025 session that are easily adoptable, playfully engaging, and flexible for a variety of instructor needs. Assignment specifications and supporting resources may be found at http://modelai.gettysburg.edu

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.673
Threshold uncertainty score0.960

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3270.133

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.462
Teacher spread0.381 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEthics and Social Impacts of AI→French-language works237,207→