ModelDiff: Symbolic Dynamic Programming for Model-Aware Policy Transfer in Deep Q-Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite significant recent advances in the field of Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), such methods typically incur high cost of training to learn effective policies, thus posing cost and safety challenges in many practical applications. To improve the learning efficiency of (D)RL methods, transfer learning (TL) has emerged as a promising approach to leverage prior experience on a source domain to speed learning on a new, but related, target domain. In this paper, we take a novel model-informed approach to TL in DRL by assuming that we have knowledge of both the source and target domain models (which would be the case in the prevalent setting of DRL with simulators). While directly solving either the source or target MDP via solution methods like value iteration is computationally prohibitive, we exploit the fact that if the target and source MDPs differ only due to a small structural change in their rewards, we can apply structured value iteration methods in a procedure we term ModelDiff to solve the much smaller target-source ``Diff'' MDP for a reasonable horizon. This ModelDiff approach can then be integrated into extensions of standard DRL algorithms like ModelDiff (MD) DQN, where it provides enhanced provable lower bound guidance to DQN that often speeds convergence for the positive transfer case while critically avoiding decelerated learning in the negative transfer case. Experiments show that MD-DQN matches or outperforms existing TL methods and baselines in both positive and negative transfer settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".