Flocking-Inspired Solar Tracking System with Adaptive Performance in Varied Environmental Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Traditional solar trackers are designed to follow the sun’s exact position, assuming that perfect sun alignment always results in optimal energy generation. However, despite perfect alignment, external factors such as shading, dust, and wind can reduce power output in real-world conditions. To address these challenges, our novel system draws inspiration from the flocking behavior of birds, where individual entities adjust their behavior based on their energy output and the energy outputs of neighboring panels. The system uses Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to mimic this behavior, dynamically adjusting the solar tracker’s position to respond to varying environmental conditions. One key innovation is introducing a power threshold strategy, set between 1.5 W and 2 W, to avoid continuous tracker movement and conserve energy by minimizing unnecessary adjustments when the power difference is insignificant. The proposed system demonstrated an impressive 8% increase in energy gain and a reduction of up to 11% in energy consumption compared to the traditional continuous tracker. The tracking accuracy improved by 84%, with the mean tracking error reduced in the range of 0.78° to 1.09°. The system also captured 17.4% more solar irradiance, showcasing its superior efficiency. Despite environmental challenges such as dust and shading, the proposed system consistently outperformed the traditional tracker regarding energy savings and overall performance, offering a more resilient and energy-efficient solution for solar energy generation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".