MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409361976 · doi:10.3390/s25082424

High-Voltage Gain Single-Switch Quadratic Semi-SEPIC Converters for Powering High-Voltage Sensors Suitable for Renewable Energy Systems and Industrial Automation with Low Voltage Stresses

2025· article· en· W4409361976 on OpenAlexaff
Frederick Nana Oppong, S. Esmaeili, Ashraf Ali Khan

Bibliographic record

VenueSensors · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersInductorVoltageTransformerDuty cycleHigh voltageVoltage multiplierEngineeringElectrical engineeringCapacitorVoltage regulationElectronic engineeringVoltage dividerComputer scienceDropout voltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents two new non-isolated DC-DC converters with and without a coupled inductor based on quadratic voltage conversion. Firstly, the coupled inductor-less type is explained in detail. It employs a voltage-boosting cell and a modified SEPIC structure to provide a high voltage boost ability with a lower and practical value for the switching duty cycle. This allows for lower power loss compared to conventional DC-DC converters. Having only one switch in the proposed converter simplifies the control and reduces the required number of control signals. Furthermore, the presented transformer-less structure can help avoid producing huge voltage spikes across the power switch. In traditional quadratic SEPIC converters, the voltage-boosting cell's capacitor experiences relatively high voltage stress due to the voltage multiplication process. In contrast, the proposed converter offers significantly lower voltage stresses. Hence, it becomes possible to utilize a capacitor with a lower voltage rating, leading to cost savings and improved reliability and availability of suitable components. The first topology can be improved for ultrahigh voltage applications by replacing the middle inductor with a coupled transformer. Consequently, a higher voltage range with a lower switching duty cycle can be attained. Theoretical analysis and mathematical derivations are provided, and the comparison section claims the proposed converter's ability to minimize voltage stress across the switch and output diode. Finally, experimental results are given to verify the effectiveness of the proposed converters at an output power of 260 W.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSensorsSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207