HVAdam: A Full-Dimension Adaptive Optimizer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adaptive optimizers such as Adam and RMSProp have gained attraction in complex neural networks, including generative adversarial networks (GANs) and Transformers, thanks to their stable performance and fast convergence compared to non-adaptive optimizers. A frequently overlooked limitation of adaptive optimizers is that adjusting the learning rate of each dimension individually would ignore the knowledge of the whole loss landscape, resulting in slow updates of parameters, invalidating the learning rate adjustment strategy and eventually leading to widespread insufficient convergence of parameters. In this paper, we propose HVAdam, a novel optimizer that associates all dimensions of the parameters to find a new parameter update direction, leading to a refined parameter update strategy for an increased convergence rate. We validated HVAdam in extensive experiments, showing its faster convergence, higher accuracy, and more stable performance on image classification, image generation, and natural language processing tasks. Particularly, HVAdam achieves a significant improvement on GANs compared with other state-of-the-art methods, especially in Wasserstein-GAN (WGAN) and its improved version with gradient penalty (WGAN-GP).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".