Bi-Level Optimization for Semi-Supervised Learning with Pseudo-Labeling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Semi-supervised learning (SSL) is a fundamental task in machine learning, empowering models to extract valuable insights from datasets with limited labeled samples and a large amount of unlabeled data. Although pseudo-labeling is a widely used approach for SSL that generates pseudo-labels for unlabeled data and leverages them as ground truth labels for training, traditional pseudo-labeling techniques often face challenges that significantly decrease the quality of pseudo-labels and hence the overall model performance. In this paper, we propose a novel Bi-level Optimization method for Pseudo-label Learning (BOPL) to boost semi-supervised training. It treats pseudo-labels as latent variables, and optimizes the model parameters and pseudo-labels jointly within a bi-level optimization framework. By enabling direct optimization over the pseudo-labels towards maximizing the prediction model performance, the method is expected to produce high-quality pseudo-labels. To evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed approach, we conduct extensive experiments on multiple SSL benchmarks. The experimental results show the proposed BOPL outperforms the state-of-the-art SSL techniques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".