HiPoser: 3D Human Pose Estimation with Hierarchical Shared Learning at Parts-Level Using Inertial Measurement Units
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers the challenging problem of 3D Human Pose Estimation (HPE) from a sparse set of Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs). Existing efforts typically reconstruct a pose sequence by either directly tackling whole-body motions or focusing on distinctive spatio-temporal features of local body parts. Unfortunately, these methods ignore existing interdependent motor synergies amongst body parts, which may lead to pose estimation with ambiguous local parts. This observation motivates us to propose a hierarchical learning-based approach, HiPoser, which utilizes a hierarchical shared structure using Mamba blocks as the backbone to focus on the following estimation tasks, involving: 1) torso pose, 2) lower limbs pose, 3) upper limbs pose, and finally 4) global translation. These tasks selectively incorporate body motion states and are to be carried out sequentially in reconstructing part-based poses, which are amalgamated to estimate the final full-body pose with the global translation that satisfies inter-part consistencies. Our hierarchical structure allows HiPoser the flexibility in prioritizing different aspects of pose estimation, to emphasize more on detail or stability. Empirical evaluations over three benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of HiPoser over existing state-of-the-art models, suggesting that analyzing the synergistic movement of body parts is indeed important for advancing IMU-based 3D HPE.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".