MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409366430 · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i8.32898

Multi-axis Prompt and Multi-dimension Fusion Network for All-in-one Weather-degraded Image Restoration

2025· article· en· W4409366430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Image Fusion Techniques
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central UniversitiesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsDimension (graph theory)Image (mathematics)FusionImage fusionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceComputer visionMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Existing approaches aiming to remove adverse weather degradations compromise the image quality and incur the long processing time. To this end, we introduce a multi-axis prompt and multi-dimension fusion network (MPMF-Net). Specifically, we develop a multi-axis prompts learning block (MPLB), which learns the prompts along three separate axis planes, requiring fewer parameters and achieving superior performance. Moreover, we present a multi-dimension feature interaction block (MFIB), which optimizes intra-scale feature fusion by segregating features along height, width and channel dimensions. This strategy enables more accurate mutual attention and adaptive weight determination. Additionally, we propose the coarse-scale degradation-free implicit neural representations (CDINR) to normalize the degradation levels of different weather conditions. Extensive experiments demonstrate the significant improvements of our model over the recent well-performing approaches in both reconstruction fidelity and inference time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.364
Threshold uncertainty score0.806

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it