Deep sequencing reveals distinct microRNA-mRNA signatures that differentiate pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor from non-diseased pancreas tissue
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Only a limited number of biomarkers guide personalized management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). Transcriptome profiling of microRNA (miRs) and mRNA has shown value in segregating PanNETs and identifying patients more likely to respond to treatment. Because miRs are key regulators of mRNA expression, we sought to integrate expression data from both RNA species into miR-mRNA interaction networks to advance our understanding of PanNET biology. METHODS: We used deep miR/mRNA sequencing on six low-grade/high-risk, well-differentiated PanNETs compared with seven non-diseased tissues to identify differentially expressed miRs/mRNAs. Then we crossed a list of differentially expressed mRNAs with a list of in silico predicted mRNA targets of the most and least abundant miRs to generate high probability miR-mRNA interaction networks. RESULTS: Gene ontology and pathway analyses revealed several miR-mRNA pairs implicated in cellular processes and pathways suggesting perturbed neuroendocrine function (miR-7 and Reg family genes), cell adhesion (miR-216 family and NLGN1, NCAM1, and CNTN1; miR-670 and the claudins, CLDN1 and CLDN2), and metabolic processes (miR-670 and BCAT1/MPST; miR-129 and CTH). CONCLUSION: These novel miR-mRNA interaction networks identified dysregulated pathways not observed when assessing mRNA alone and provide a foundation for further investigation of their utility as diagnostic and predictive biomarkers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".