MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409374482 · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-26102

Preweaning nutrient supply improves lactation productivity and reduces the risk of culling in Holstein cows

2025· article· en· W4409374482 on OpenAlexaff
L.N. Leal, Jean‐Baptiste Daniel, John Doelman, Brian Keppler, M.A. Steele, J. Martín‐Tereso

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCullingLactationAnimal scienceProductivityNutrientMilk productionBiologyPregnancyHerdEconomicsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study aimed to investigate the effects of preweaning nutrient intake on milk production in the 2 first lactations, risk of culling, and metabolomic profiles of dairy cows fed a restricted (RES) or an elevated (ELE) milk supply preweaning. A total of 86 female Holstein Friesian calves were randomly assigned to either 5.4 Mcal of ME in 8 L of milk replacer (MR) per day (ELE) or 2.7 Mcal of ME in 4 L of MR per day (RES) from d 2 after birth until they were stepped down by 50% from d 42 to d 49 and fully weaned at d 50. Starting from d 50, animals from both treatment groups were fed and managed in the same way, with treatments being blinded, for the entire study duration. At 60 DIM in the first lactation, blood samples were taken for metabolomic analysis. Heifers fed the ELE diet exhibited higher ADG (0.79 vs. 0.49 kg/d) in the preweaning period, leading to higher BW at 70 d of age (94 vs. 85 kg). In the first lactation, cows fed the ELE diet preweaning exhibited higher DMI (+0.7 kg/d), higher milk fat yield (+50 g/d), and higher milk fat content (+0.24%) but lower feed efficiency (-0.04) than cows in the RES group. In the second lactation, fat- and protein-corrected milk yield (+1.8 kg/d), milk fat yield (+115 g/d), milk fat content (+0.22%), and feed efficiency (+0.06) were all higher in ELE cows. Throughout these 2 lactations, ELE cows were leaner, as indicated by a lower BCS. Cows fed the ELE diet preweaning had a higher first-service conception rate during the second lactation than cows fed the RES diet (40.7% vs. 13.0%). Moreover, the likelihood to be culled before third, fourth, or fifth calving was halved when calves were fed ELE compared with RES. Metabolomic profiling revealed distinct metabolomic profiles at 60 DIM in response to preweaning milk supply. The major metabolic pathways affected by preweaning nutrient supply at 60 DIM were pyrimidine, sphingosine, guanidino, acetamido, and purine metabolism and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. The metabolic profile differences between the groups describe a metabolic configuration that was sustained into adulthood and that may explain the improved productivity and resilience of cows fed a greater milk supply during the preweaning period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207