Post-cardiac surgery atrial fibrillation and sex differences in clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract There is conflicting literature on sex differences and clinical outcomes in patients who develop atrial fibrillation (AF) post-cardiac surgery. Our aim was to compare clinical outcomes between females and males with post-cardiac surgery AF. A systematic search was conducted for studies published until 27 September 2024 in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL. Included studies compared mortality and stroke in females vs. males who developed AF after cardiac surgery. Outcomes of interest were mortality and stroke. Pooled prevalence was used to compare comorbidities. Raw event rates were used to calculate odds ratios (ORs), which were pooled with a fixed-effects model. 10 422 studies were identified and 5 studies met inclusion criteria. 14 970 patients who developed AF after cardiac surgery were included, of whom 3748 were females. The length of follow-up was up to 10 years. The weighted average age was 70.4 ± 2.9 years in females and 66.7 ± 2.4 years in males (P = 0.32). At baseline, females had a higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidemia, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease. The odds of in-hospital mortality among females were higher compared to males (5.5 vs. 3.0%; OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.42–2.91, P < 0.001, I2 = 57%). There were no significant differences in post-discharge mortality (45.6 vs. 42.9%; OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.97–1.15, P = 0.23, I2 = 0%) or in-hospital stroke (2.5 vs. 1.9%; OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.79–2.13, P = 0.30, I2 = 57%) in females vs. males. In conclusion, females with post-cardiac surgery AF had a higher prevalence of comorbidities at baseline. The odds of in-hospital mortality were twice as high among females. There were no significant differences in post-discharge mortality or in-hospital stroke. Future studies are warranted to understand the mechanisms of increased in-hospital mortality in females and to develop effective monitoring strategies and interventions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.030 | 0.015 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it