MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409383717 · doi:10.1186/s13039-025-00712-9

Epigenomic insights and computational advances in hematologic malignancies

2025· review· en· W4409383717 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Cytogenetics · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersLondon Health Sciences Foundation
KeywordsEpigenomicsHuman geneticsHematologic NeoplasmsComputational biologyMedicineBiologyGeneticsInternal medicineCancerDNA methylation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hematologic malignancies (HMs) encompass a diverse spectrum of cancers originating from the blood, bone marrow, and lymphatic systems, with myeloid malignancies representing a significant and complex subset. This review provides a focused analysis of their classification, prevalence, and incidence, highlighting the persistent challenges posed by their intricate genetic and epigenetic landscapes in clinical diagnostics and therapeutics. The genetic basis of myeloid malignancies, including chromosomal translocations, somatic mutations, and copy number variations, is examined in detail, alongside epigenetic modifications with a specific emphasis on DNA methylation. We explore the dynamic interplay between genetic and epigenetic factors, demonstrating how these mechanisms collectively shape disease progression, therapeutic resistance, and clinical outcomes. Advances in diagnostic modalities, particularly those integrating epigenomic insights, are revolutionizing the precision diagnosis of HMs. Key approaches such as nano-based contrast agents, optical imaging, flow cytometry, circulating tumor DNA analysis, and somatic mutation testing are discussed, with particular attention to the transformative role of machine learning in epigenetic data analysis. DNA methylation episignatures have emerged as a pivotal tool, enabling the development of highly sensitive and specific diagnostic and prognostic assays that are now being adopted in clinical practice. We also review the impact of computational advancements and data integration in refining diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. By combining genomic and epigenomic profiling techniques, these innovations are accelerating biomarker discovery and clinical translation, with applications in precision oncology becoming increasingly evident. Comprehensive genomic datasets, coupled with artificial intelligence, are driving actionable insights into the biology of myeloid malignancies and facilitating the optimization of patient management strategies. Finally, this review emphasizes the translational potential of these advancements, focusing on their tangible benefits for patient care and outcomes. By synthesizing current knowledge and recent innovations, we underscore the critical role of precision medicine and epigenomic research in transforming the diagnosis and treatment of myeloid malignancies, setting the stage for ongoing advancements and broader clinical implementation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it