MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409385175 · doi:10.1016/j.scca.2025.100069

A comprehensive review of conversion of rice biomass into sustainable products: A green approach toward a circular economy

2025· review· en· W4409385175 on OpenAlexaff
Diana Jose, Senthil Muthu Kumar Thiagamani, V. Ponnusami, Suksun Amornraksa, Malinee Sriariyanun

Bibliographic record

VenueSustainable Chemistry for Climate Action · 2025
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiofuel production and bioconversion
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNemzeti Kutatási, Fejlesztési és Innovaciós AlapThailand Science Research and InnovationKing Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok
KeywordsCircular economyBiomass (ecology)BusinessEnvironmental scienceNatural resource economicsAgricultural economicsAgricultural engineeringEconomicsAgronomyEngineeringEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A comprehensive analysis of rice husk and straw utilization in biomass valorization. • Exploration of innovative technologies such as enzymatic saccharification, and advanced pretreatment methods to enhance biomass conversion efficiency. • Emphasis on the environmental benefits of reducing agricultural waste, lowering greenhouse gas emissions, and promoting sustainability through the circular economy. • The review focussed on economic opportunities in industrial applications, including energy, agriculture, and materials, by repurposing rice biomass. Rice biomass, often regarded as agricultural waste, holds immense promise as a renewable resource for producing various bioproducts through biorefinery processes. The current trends of circular economy motivate the exploration of the valorization of rice biomass, particularly rice husk and straw, emphasizing their potential to promote environmental sustainability and economic viability. This review highlights recent advancements in pretreatment techniques, enzymatic saccharification, and bioconversion processes that improve the efficiency of rice biomass utilization. Key innovations, such as deep eutectic solvents (DES), microwave-assisted methods, and chemical modifications, have significantly enhanced enzymatic digestibility, facilitating bioethanol production and other value-added products. Despite these advancements, challenges in large-scale industrial adoption persist, including cost-effectiveness, feedstock variability, and process integration. The study also addresses the economic and environmental benefits of utilizing rice biomass for bio-based products, energy generation, and wastewater treatment, underscoring the role of nanomaterials like rice husk biochar in environmental remediation. Future opportunities for rice biomass valorization lie in enhancing process efficiency, waste stream valorization, and the integration of biorefinery concepts to produce multiple high-value products. Furthermore, fostering a sustainable bioeconomy requires continuous research, public policy support, and industry collaboration to overcome existing barriers. Ultimately, this review presents rice biomass as a critical resource in advancing sustainable development, contributing to reduced greenhouse gas emissions, circular resource use, and a greener future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Direct model labels (unvalidated)

Per-model category and study-design labels from the labeling rounds. They are machine output, unvalidated, and the disagreement between models ships as data. No study design here is MEDLINE-validated yet.

Model armCategoriesStudy designConfidence
gemmano category
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Not applicablelow
gptno category
Domain: not available · Genre: Review
About the Canadian research system: no · About a Canadian topic: no
Systematic reviewlow
models splitAgreement compares identical category sets and study designs across arms.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Labeled directly by 2 models reading the full record.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.

The models disagree on parts of this classification; every voice is preserved in the section at the end of the page.

Study designNot applicable · Systematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSustainable Chemistry for Climate ActionSame topicBiofuel production and bioconversionFrench-language works237,207