MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4409387695 · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2025.113462

Improved dynamic time warping for fire safety emergency response: A robust and interpretable extension

2025· article· en· W4409387695 on OpenAlex
Yaoyu Zhang, Huilei Wang, M. Hamed Mozaffari, Yoon Ko, Nour Elsagan, Chi-Guhn Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge-Based Systems · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of TorontoUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersUniversity of East AngliaNational Research Council
KeywordsDynamic time warpingImage warpingExtension (predicate logic)Emergency responseComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMedicineMedical emergencyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multivariate time series classification (MTSC) has gained considerable attention in the fire safety industry, enabling the development of specialized algorithms based on the unique characteristics of fire-related time series. Traditional feature representation techniques (e.g., SAX , DTW) often incur high computational costs, offer limited interpretability , and focus primarily on shape information. Moreover, many TSC algorithms struggle with robustness under distributional shifts across diverse fire environments. We propose a new algorithm that strengthens robust feature representations and modeling, enabling groupwise feature importance analysis for fire classification. Our approach captures both shape and amplitude information, along with first-order differences, by integrating SAX and DTW with random SAX baselines and masks to remove potential noise. We then apply a sequence of groupwise logistic classifiers, using penalties on dimensionally grouped features to capture group effects. Numerical experiments on specific fire safety scenarios and the UEA MTS Archive confirm the model’s robustness and interpretability . Furthermore, we have developed AI-driven software that helps first responders detect burning materials from gas emissions, guided by the Emergency Response Guidebook (ERG). This integrated solution equips emergency teams with essential tools for timely and informed fire response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it